Chapter Captain MKG: In this segment, I wonder whether the second paragraph can be bolstered by reference to the decisions of Corely and its ilk that expressly found no fair use  exception exists for the anticircumvention measures/ DRM protection tools.  Not sure whether it should be included in the text or whether this becomes a bit encyclopeadic and thus, it should more properly be in the footnotes.

Also, the fourth paragraph that talks about contracting over rights to reverse engineer - can we update this with recent caselaw?  Again,we need to decide whether to do it in the text itself or just a paragraph. 

Finally, the UCITA discussion is no doubt in need of an update...suggestions, anyone?